4 Comments
May 2Liked by Nate Patrin

It is exhausting. Making any sort of opinion public brings the flies to the shit. Something I've been wrestling with lately (and I feel like you touch on this a bit here but I need to re-read because you're going over a lot here and I'm whacked out on Benadryl) is this boogieman, monoculture. I actually think it's not dead, and in fact made very much alive by the way we're using all of this social media. It feels very different to have these taste-identities fed to us vs the way people have collected and cultivated them in the past—although I'm not trying to cater to nostalgia, or one-up any generation by that. I think that stranger, this notion that more variety is available than ever give us an unlimited playground of art, music and culture is having another weird effect of making "that guy (no gender)". Was it different in the 90s? In the 2000s? I haven't really been able to come to a conclusion I feel definite about. Thanks for taking the time to write this, even tweeting anything remotely on the topic exhausts me.

Expand full comment

“the concept of "rockism" was introduced to the readers of the New York Times by Kelefah Sanneh nearly twenty years ago”

Wasn’t it more like 40+ years ago, in the pages of the UK music weeklies?

Expand full comment
author

Yeah, this is what I meant by "and the arguments against it were rippling through the enthusiast music press and internet messageboards for several years -- hell, decades -- before that." (A lot of the early '00s rockism debates came to the fore again thanks to discussions on the I Love Music forum a few years before the Sanneh piece, where people who not only read but wrote for those weeklies renewed the debate for a wider internet audience.)

Expand full comment

Thanks. I thought I’d read it somewhere before, but I’m now officially old and my memory is producing some fascinating distortions of what I thought I knew.

Expand full comment